VizieR

CfA VizieR . ADAC VizieR . Cambridge (UK) VizieR . IUCAA VizieR . INASAN VizieR .

VizieR


Simple TargetList Of TargetsFast Xmatch with large catalogs or Simbad
Target Name (resolved by Sesame) or Position:
Target dimension:
NB: The epoch used for the query is the original epoch of the table(s)Radius Box size

  
VI/49
  Constellation Boundary Data (Davenhall+ 1989)
1997yCat.6049....0D
See also the complete list of constellations
4 annotation(s)
img(gal)
1.VI/49/bound_20Boundaries for J2000 (updated version) (12948 rows)

 
Query by Constraints constraints help applied on Columns (Output Order: + - )
ShowSortColumn  Constraint Explain   (UCD)
  recno  Record number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification. (meta.record)
  RAJ2000 deg (i) [0/360] Right ascension in degrees (J2000) (pos.eq.ra;meta.main)
  DEJ2000 deg (i) [-86/89] Declination in degrees (J2000) (pos.eq.dec;meta.main)
  cst (char) Constellation abbreviation (meta.id.part)
  type (char) [OI] Type of point (Original or Interpolated) (meta.note)

ALL cols
    
 (i)indexed column
Adapt form
Display your selection only Reset to default columns
usage  Display UCD1+    UCD1  
Annotations on VI/49
Posted by gastin (2024/11/13 10:36:07)
[VI/49]
Since the revision of July 2024, the file is sorted by RA. In the previous version, the file was sorted by the constellation and contiguous points.
The previous version allows to draw the boundary of the constellation (polygons).
The new version permits only to retrieve the points of the boundary and not the arcs of th boundaries. The current file is unusuable.

Could you reprocess the file in order to have the same behavior as before ?
Posted by sckoehler (2024/06/09 15:15:37)
[VI/49]
When the circumpolar arc of UMI was fixed, the corresponding arc in CEP was not changed. As a result, if you plot both UMI and CEP, the arcs do not line up.
Posted by eperret (2019/10/13 11:24:22)
[VI/49]
[UMI] and [OCT] J2000 boundaries have been fixed in August 2019, see the History section of the ReadMe file.
Posted by lheller (2019/07/06 12:37:25)
[VI/49]
Both [UMI] and [OCT] J2000 interpolated data are partially incorrect. See the linked generated pictures from the data:

For reference see the appropriate constellation boundaries here.
elapse time 0